|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha : |
19/07/2015 |
Actualizado : |
21/10/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Revista INIA |
Autor : |
INIA (INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA) |
Título : |
Revista INIA Uruguay. (No.39, Diciembre 2014). |
Fecha de publicación : |
2014 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2014- |
Páginas : |
84 p. |
Serie : |
(Revista INIA; 39) |
ISSN : |
1510-9011 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Thesagro : |
ARROZ; BIOTECNOLOGIA; BOVINOS DE CARNE; CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO; CIENCIA; CITRUS; CLIMA; CLIMATOLOGIA; COMUNICACIÓN; CONTROL DE ENFERMEDADES; CULTIVOS DE GRANO; CULTIVOS DE SECANO; ENTOMOLOGIA; ESPECIES FORRAJERAS; EUCALYPTUS; EXPLOTACION AGRICOLA FAMILIAR; FITOPATOLOGÍA; FORESTALES; FORRAJES; FRUTALES; FRUTICULTURA; GANADO BOVINO; GRANOS; GRAS; HORTALIZAS; HORTICULTURA; INIA; INNOVACION; INVESTIGACIÓN; LECHERÍA; LEGUMINOSAS FORRAJERAS; MANEJO DEL CULTIVO; MEJORAMIENTO ANIMAL; METEOROLOGIA; MICROBIOLOGÍA; OVINOS; PASTURAS; PRODUCCIÓN ANIMAL; PRODUCCION DE LANA; PRODUCCION DE LECHE; PRODUCCION LECHERA; REVISTA INIA 2014; SEMILLAS; SOJA; SUELOS; SUINOS; SUSTENTABILIDAD AMBIENTAL; TECNOLOGÍA; TRANSFERENCIA DE TECNOLOGIA; VARIEDADES; VITICULTURA. |
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/4854/1/revista-INIA-39.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01909nam a2200745 a 4500 001 1053104 005 2019-10-21 008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1510-9011 100 1 $aINIA (INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA) 245 $aRevista INIA Uruguay. (No.39, Diciembre 2014). 260 $aMontevideo (Uruguay): INIA$c2014 300 $a84 p. 490 $a(Revista INIA; 39) 650 $aARROZ 650 $aBIOTECNOLOGIA 650 $aBOVINOS DE CARNE 650 $aCAMBIO CLIMÁTICO 650 $aCIENCIA 650 $aCITRUS 650 $aCLIMA 650 $aCLIMATOLOGIA 650 $aCOMUNICACIÓN 650 $aCONTROL DE ENFERMEDADES 650 $aCULTIVOS DE GRANO 650 $aCULTIVOS DE SECANO 650 $aENTOMOLOGIA 650 $aESPECIES FORRAJERAS 650 $aEUCALYPTUS 650 $aEXPLOTACION AGRICOLA FAMILIAR 650 $aFITOPATOLOGÍA 650 $aFORESTALES 650 $aFORRAJES 650 $aFRUTALES 650 $aFRUTICULTURA 650 $aGANADO BOVINO 650 $aGRANOS 650 $aGRAS 650 $aHORTALIZAS 650 $aHORTICULTURA 650 $aINIA 650 $aINNOVACION 650 $aINVESTIGACIÓN 650 $aLECHERÍA 650 $aLEGUMINOSAS FORRAJERAS 650 $aMANEJO DEL CULTIVO 650 $aMEJORAMIENTO ANIMAL 650 $aMETEOROLOGIA 650 $aMICROBIOLOGÍA 650 $aOVINOS 650 $aPASTURAS 650 $aPRODUCCIÓN ANIMAL 650 $aPRODUCCION DE LANA 650 $aPRODUCCION DE LECHE 650 $aPRODUCCION LECHERA 650 $aREVISTA INIA 2014 650 $aSEMILLAS 650 $aSOJA 650 $aSUELOS 650 $aSUINOS 650 $aSUSTENTABILIDAD AMBIENTAL 650 $aTECNOLOGÍA 650 $aTRANSFERENCIA DE TECNOLOGIA 650 $aVARIEDADES 650 $aVITICULTURA
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha actual : |
17/10/2014 |
Actualizado : |
15/09/2020 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
CUBBAGE, F.; MAC DONAGH, P.; SAWINSKI, J.; RUBILAR, R.; DONOSO, P.; FERREIRA, A.; HOEFLICH, V.; MORALES OLMOS, V.; FERREIRA, G.; BALMELLI, G.; SIRY, J.; BAEZ, M.N.; ALVAREZ, J. |
Afiliación : |
FREDERICK CUBBAGE, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; PATRICIO MAC DONAGH, Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNAM), Eldorado, Misiones, Argentina; JOSÉ SAWINSKI, Universidade do Contestado-Canoinhas, Canoinhas, Brazil; RAFAEL RUBILAR, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile; PABLO DONOSO, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile; ARNALDO FERREIRA, Consultant, Forest Genetics, Los Angeles, CA, USA; VITOR HOEFLICH, Embrapa Florestas and Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Brazil Curitiba, Brazil; VIRGINIA MORALES OLMOS, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA; GUSTAVO ALVARO FERREIRA DE MATTOS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUSTAVO DANIEL BALMELLI HERNANDEZ, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay; JACEK SIRY, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA; MIRTA NOEMI BÁEZ, Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNAM), Eldorado, Misiones, Argentina; JOSÉ ALVAREZ, CMPC Forestry, Concepción, Chile. |
Título : |
Timber investment returns for selected plantations and native forests in South America and the Southern United States. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2007 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
New Forests, 2007, v. 33, no. 3, p. 237-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-006-9025-4 |
DOI : |
10.1007/s11056-006-9025-4 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 3 April 2006 / Accepted: 15 October 2006 / Published online: 13 December 2006. |
Contenido : |
Timber investment returns were estimated for the principal exotic and selected native species in the Southern Cone of Latin America and in the Southern United States. Exotic eucalyptus plantations in South America were most profitable, with internal rates of returns (IRRs) ranging from 13% to 23%, followed by exotic loblolly pine, with IRRs from 9% to 17%. Average loblolly pine plantation returns in the US South were less profitable, with an IRR of about 9.5%, and natural forest management in the South had IRRs of 4% to 8%. Subtropical native species plantations of the best araucaria and nothofagus species had reasonable financial returns, with IRRs ranging from 5% to 13%. Subtropical or tropical native forests had fewer commercial timber species, and had much lower growth rates and returns.
Their IRRs were less than 4%, or even negative for unmanaged stands. State subsidy payments for forest plantations or for timber stand improvements increased IRRs
somewhat and reserving areas for environmental protection reduced their IRRs slightly. Including land costs in the cash flows decreased these internal rates of return
substantially. Natural stand returns in Latin America were much less than those of plantations, but management of those stands offered better rates of return than only
holding the land. |
Palabras claves : |
BIOLOGICAL AND FINANCIAL RISK; DESARROLLO TERRITORIAL; FINANCIAL ANALYSES; FOREST PLANTATIONS; LATIN AMERICA; NATIVE FORESTS; SECTOR FORESTAL-MADERERO; URUGUAY. |
Thesagro : |
AMERICA DEL SUR; EUCALYPTUS; FORESTACIÓN; INVERSIONES; MADERA. |
Asunto categoría : |
K10 Producción forestal |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/3570/1/New-Forests2007v33n3p237-255.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02683naa a2200445 a 4500 001 1051160 005 2020-09-15 008 2007 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1007/s11056-006-9025-4$2DOI 100 1 $aCUBBAGE, F. 245 $aTimber investment returns for selected plantations and native forests in South America and the Southern United States. 260 $c2007 500 $aArticle history: Received: 3 April 2006 / Accepted: 15 October 2006 / Published online: 13 December 2006. 520 $aTimber investment returns were estimated for the principal exotic and selected native species in the Southern Cone of Latin America and in the Southern United States. Exotic eucalyptus plantations in South America were most profitable, with internal rates of returns (IRRs) ranging from 13% to 23%, followed by exotic loblolly pine, with IRRs from 9% to 17%. Average loblolly pine plantation returns in the US South were less profitable, with an IRR of about 9.5%, and natural forest management in the South had IRRs of 4% to 8%. Subtropical native species plantations of the best araucaria and nothofagus species had reasonable financial returns, with IRRs ranging from 5% to 13%. Subtropical or tropical native forests had fewer commercial timber species, and had much lower growth rates and returns. Their IRRs were less than 4%, or even negative for unmanaged stands. State subsidy payments for forest plantations or for timber stand improvements increased IRRs somewhat and reserving areas for environmental protection reduced their IRRs slightly. Including land costs in the cash flows decreased these internal rates of return substantially. Natural stand returns in Latin America were much less than those of plantations, but management of those stands offered better rates of return than only holding the land. 650 $aAMERICA DEL SUR 650 $aEUCALYPTUS 650 $aFORESTACIÓN 650 $aINVERSIONES 650 $aMADERA 653 $aBIOLOGICAL AND FINANCIAL RISK 653 $aDESARROLLO TERRITORIAL 653 $aFINANCIAL ANALYSES 653 $aFOREST PLANTATIONS 653 $aLATIN AMERICA 653 $aNATIVE FORESTS 653 $aSECTOR FORESTAL-MADERERO 653 $aURUGUAY 700 1 $aMAC DONAGH, P. 700 1 $aSAWINSKI, J. 700 1 $aRUBILAR, R. 700 1 $aDONOSO, P. 700 1 $aFERREIRA, A. 700 1 $aHOEFLICH, V. 700 1 $aMORALES OLMOS, V. 700 1 $aFERREIRA, G. 700 1 $aBALMELLI, G. 700 1 $aSIRY, J. 700 1 $aBAEZ, M.N. 700 1 $aALVAREZ, J. 773 $tNew Forests, 2007$gv. 33, no. 3, p. 237-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-006-9025-4
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|